Culhane Meadows’ Atlanta partner, Harve Linder was recently featured in an article by HRD America about the new suggested ban on non-compete agreements by the FTC.
Here are a few excerpts from the article:
HR leaders have until Friday to voice their concerns regarding the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)’s proposal to ban non-compete clauses.
If enacted, the ban will have a “disastrous effect” on small businesses, potentially forcing some to shut their doors and cease operations, according to employment attorney Harvey R. Linder.
“When a company, particularly a small company, loses one of its employees, it runs the risk of having that former employee (and his/her new employer) poach the company’s existing customers,” Linder, partner in the Atlanta offices of national law firm Culhane Meadows, told HRD.
“Also, the former employee can decimate the former company’s workforce by soliciting other co-workers. Small companies run the risk of losing a substantive number of customers and/or employees, and I’ve personally seen this happen where restrictive covenants weren’t in place.”
A non-compete clause, as defined by the FTC, is a contractual term between an employer and a worker that prevents the latter from working for a competing employer, or starting a competing business, typically within a certain geographic area and period of time after the worker’s employment ends.
Approximately 30 million American workers are bound by a non-compete clause, according to the FTC, which estimates the proposed rule would increase workers’ earnings between $250 billion and $296 billion per year.
“I’m not sure where the FTC gets these numbers, but they seem spurious,” Linder says. “I don’t deny that there will be an increase in wages and more jobs, but it’s way overstated. This is especially true because of the severe deleterious impact a ban will have on businesses. So, whatever number may be accurate, but it doesn’t take into account how many jobs will be lost from the potential demise of many businesses.”
Initially, non-compete clauses were reserved for technical employees, those who possessed the keys to the business and knew everything about the core product/service. Once employers noticed that non-competes influenced the retention rate, they expanded the clauses to all employees, which prompted the courts to intervene.
“Slowly, over the years, various state legislatures and (more often) various state courts have eroded non-competes to a certain extent,” Linder says. “As a simplification, courts have required companies to show why it’s reasonable for a court to enforce them. Each state that has done so has generally established different criteria that it uses in its deliberation on this.”
If the FTC’s proposal goes through, Linder says, HR leaders and employment lawyers should be ready to hit the ground running.
“I’ve avoided the use of direct non-compete and territorial provisions in recent years, instead preferring strong non-solicitation of customers and employees clauses,” Linder says. “But my concern with the proposed ban is that I don’t know what language will ultimately get passed, and I don’t know how broadly courts will interpret the non-compete ban. It’s possible that a non-compete could be defined (or interpreted) to include non-solicitation clauses, which would be disastrous.”
Read the entire article HERE to learn more.
About Culhane Meadows – Big Law for the New Economy®
The largest woman-owned national full-service business law firm in the U.S., Culhane Meadows fields over 70 partners in eleven major markets across the country. Uniquely structured, the firm’s Disruptive Law® business model gives attorneys greater work-life flexibility while delivering outstanding, partner-level legal services to major corporations and emerging companies across industry sectors more efficiently and cost-effectively than conventional law firms. Clients enjoy exceptional and highly-efficient legal services provided exclusively by partner-level attorneys with significant experience and training from large law firms or in-house legal departments of respected corporations. U.S. News & World Report has named Culhane Meadows among the country’s “Best Law Firms” in its 2014 through 2023 rankings and many of the firm’s partners are regularly recognized in Chambers, Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers and Martindale-Hubbell Peer Reviews.
The foregoing content is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Federal, state, and local laws can change rapidly and, therefore, this content may become obsolete or outdated. Please consult with an attorney of your choice to ensure you obtain the most current and accurate counsel about your particular situation.