David Klimaszewski discusses new IRS bulletin in a recent article by PLANSPONSOR

David Klimaszewski, a partner in Culhane Meadows’ Dallas office, was recently interviewed for an article by PLANSPONSOR which discusses a new IRS issued ‘helpful’ bulletin for a preapproved plan.

Here are some excerpts from the article:

In a bulletin, the IRS has put preapproved defined contribution plans on notice of the consequences for missing the July 31 deadline to submit restated plan documents.

Preapproved plans are required to be restated every six years to incorporate changes to the retirement plan and new laws and regulations.

“The IRS expects that a lot of people will end up missing that deadline,” says David Klimaszewski, partner at law firm Culhane Meadows. “They came out with this particular bulletin to let companies know what would happen if they screwed up and they missed the deadline for restating their plan, if they have a prototype plan.”

The bulletin came in the midst of the IRS fielding questions about the issue and anticipating many more questions before July ends, Klimaszewski explains.

“The IRS bulletin is basically a warning for employers,” he adds. “It was a very helpful piece of guidance to get; it did actually answer several questions that I had with the self-correction procedure.”

“The IRS issued this to make it clear what the consequences were, and the consequences are [that] if you do not timely adopt a restated document then technically you have an individually designed plan,” adds Klimaszewski. “And of course it doesn’t satisfy the qualification requirements, but you can fix that by going through the IRS’ self-correction procedures.”

Restatements are an opportunity for employers with preapproved plans to ensure that documents fully integrate law changes, adds Klimaszewski.

“Typically, the restatements are a good chance to update the plan, but a restatement also will reflect better the new law,” he says. “You don’t just regurgitate the code—what Congress has said—you actually go in and explain it and figure out how that’s going to affect your plan and address the appropriate provisions.”

DC plans are grouped into five cycles for submitting restated plan adoption agreements. This year concerns cycle three plans, which are sponsored by a company with an employer identification number that ends in two or seven, Klimaszewski adds.

“Basically, one-fifth of the prototype plans that are out there have to be restated by this July 31, and another 20% will be restated by July 31, 2023, and then another 20% by July 31, 2024, et cetera,” he says.

The statement concludes by advising plan sponsors that “being a pre-approved plan is one method of meeting the requirement to have an updated written plan document.” It continues, “If the employer who sponsors a plan does not timely adopt a current pre-approved plan, it can still meet the written document requirements as an individually designed plan. Individually designed plans that don’t meet those requirements can be self-corrected under the circumstances detailed in Rev. Proc. 2021-30, Part IV.”

The complete article can be found here.


About Culhane MeadowsBig Law for the New Economy®
The largest woman-owned national full-service business law firm in the U.S., Culhane Meadows fields over 70 partners in eleven major markets across the country. Uniquely structured, the firm’s Disruptive Law® business model gives attorneys greater work-life flexibility while delivering outstanding, partner-level legal services to major corporations and emerging companies across industry sectors more efficiently and cost-effectively than conventional law firms. Clients enjoy exceptional and highly-efficient legal services provided exclusively by partner-level attorneys with significant experience and training from large law firms or in-house legal departments of respected corporations. U.S. News & World Report has named Culhane Meadows among the country’s “Best Law Firms” in its 2014 through 2022 rankings and many of the firm’s partners are regularly recognized in Chambers, Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers and Martindale-Hubbell Peer Reviews.


The foregoing content is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Federal, state, and local laws can change rapidly and, therefore, this content may become obsolete or outdated. Please consult with an attorney of your choice to ensure you obtain the most current and accurate counsel about your particular situation.

*Culhane Meadows is ranked by U.S. News/Best Law Firms in Technology Law, Bankruptcy/Reorganization Law, and Information Technology Law. This website and the communications herein may be considered attorney advertising. Previous results are not a guarantee of future outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information herein is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Until you establish such a relationship and receive an engagement letter, you have not hired a Culhane Meadows attorney nor become a client of the firm. Whether you are a new or existing client of the firm, Culhane Meadows must determine that there is no conflict of interest and that it is willing and otherwise able to accept the new engagement before representing you on a new matter. Only if and after Culhane Meadows has informed you it is willing and able to accept your new matter should you send the firm any information or documents that you consider private or confidential. Such information will not be treated as private, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure until Culhane Meadows has communicated in writing that it is willing and able to accept your new matter and provide you with legal counsel. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer or law firm you select are important decisions that should not be based on this website alone.