Bob Dremluk: Legal Update on Unfinished Business Claims in NY and CA

Robert W. Dremluk, a partner in our New York City office, recently authored a two-part article about unfinished business claims. This article was published in the September and October 2014 issues of the Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report, an ALM publication. Mr. Dremluk was trial counsel for Seyfarth Shaw, the only firm to obtain dismissal of unfinished business claims at the trial court level.

View Part 1 HERE.

View Part 2 HERE.

The article explores recent case law developments, particularly in New York and California. Specifically, it highlights the recent decision by the New York Court of Appeals that held that New York does not recognized unfinished business claims for hourly rate matters — noting that pending hourly fee matters are not partnership property or unfin­ished business within the meaning of New York’s Partnership Law and that a law firm does not own a cli­ent or an engagement, and is only entitled to be paid for services actu­ally rendered.

On the other hand, the validity of unfinished business claims remains unsettled in many other jurisdictions. For example, bankruptcy trustees continue to prosecute such claims under California law. One of the reasons why this is occurring may be because the California Supreme Court has never ruled on the issue — arguably providing the trustees with the ability to pursue such claims — at least until the California Supreme Court is faced with the issue and decides whether or not to adopt the reasoning and analysis of the New York’s highest court. 

Robert Dremluk is a partner in the New York office of Culhane Meadows, practicing in the areas of litigation, finance, bankruptcy, and creditors’ rights.  His work focuses on diverse interests in federal and bankruptcy court litigation and advice and risk assessment regarding transactional matters, including asset purchases, structured finance transactions, real estate workouts, foreclosures, and purchases and sales of distressed assets.

*Culhane Meadows is ranked by U.S. News/Best Law Firms in Technology Law, Bankruptcy/Reorganization Law, and Information Technology Law. This website and the communications herein may be considered attorney advertising. Previous results are not a guarantee of future outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information herein is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Until you establish such a relationship and receive an engagement letter, you have not hired a Culhane Meadows attorney nor become a client of the firm. Whether you are a new or existing client of the firm, Culhane Meadows must determine that there is no conflict of interest and that it is willing and otherwise able to accept the new engagement before representing you on a new matter. Only if and after Culhane Meadows has informed you it is willing and able to accept your new matter should you send the firm any information or documents that you consider private or confidential. Such information will not be treated as private, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure until Culhane Meadows has communicated in writing that it is willing and able to accept your new matter and provide you with legal counsel. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer or law firm you select are important decisions that should not be based on this website alone.