Bob Dremluk Discusses Cram Down Interest Rates

The July 31, 2015 issue of The Bankruptcy Strategist contains an article written by Bob Dremluk about a recent case law development in the Momentive bankruptcy cases with respect determining the cram down interest rate for a secured loan in a Chapter 11 case.

On appeal from an order confirming the debtors’ Chapter 11 plan the senior lien appellants argued that the plan of reorganization violated section 1129(b) by using a “formula approach” to calculate the cramdown interest rate, and, in the alternative, by calculating the cramdown interest rate under the formula approach incorrectly.

The court aimagesffirmed the bankruptcy court’s order, noting that the cramdown rate is meant “to put the creditor in the same economic position that it would have been had it received the value of its claim immediately. The purpose is not to put the creditor in the same position that it would have been had it arranged a ‘new” loan.

The court further held that the efficient market approach advocated by the appellants overcompensates creditors because the market lending rate must be high enough to cover factors, like lenders’ transaction costs and overall profits that are no longer relevant in the context of court-administered and court-supervised cramdown loans.

Finally, the court found that the risk premiums used by the bankruptcy court in a range of between 1% to 3% were well within the bounds of reasonableness and therefore would not be disturbed.

This ruling has been appealed to the Second Circuit.

While the Momentive decision has certainly shaken up the lending markets, Bob discusses some alternatives that may counter the impact that the case is having on secured lending.

At the same time, the potential cramdown of secured claims at below market rates of interest should be carefully evaluated by distressed debt investors — at least until the Second Circuit rules on the pending Momentive appeal.

Until then, it is evident that Momentive represents a shift of power toward debtors and junior creditors in Chapter 11 cases for the foreseeable future.

*Culhane Meadows is ranked by U.S. News/Best Law Firms in Technology Law, Bankruptcy/Reorganization Law, and Information Technology Law. This website and the communications herein may be considered attorney advertising. Previous results are not a guarantee of future outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information herein is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Until you establish such a relationship and receive an engagement letter, you have not hired a Culhane Meadows attorney nor become a client of the firm. Whether you are a new or existing client of the firm, Culhane Meadows must determine that there is no conflict of interest and that it is willing and otherwise able to accept the new engagement before representing you on a new matter. Only if and after Culhane Meadows has informed you it is willing and able to accept your new matter should you send the firm any information or documents that you consider private or confidential. Such information will not be treated as private, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure until Culhane Meadows has communicated in writing that it is willing and able to accept your new matter and provide you with legal counsel. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer or law firm you select are important decisions that should not be based on this website alone.

Accessibility Toolbar