Scott Anderson & Robert Klinger interviewed by Tech Transfer Tactics for an article about potential consequences for WSU in the face of fraud allegations against their biotech spinout, Athira Pharma

Tech Transfer Tactics recently interviewed Culhane Meadows’ Atlanta partner Scott Anderson and Dallas partner Robert Klinger to discuss the potential consequences of allegations of research fraud by the chief executive of Athira Pharma, a Washington State University biotech spinout.

Here are some excerpts from Scott and Robert’s interview:

WSU is not named as a defendant in the lawsuits, but it nonetheless could face serious consequences if the allegations are proven true, says patent attorney J. Scott Anderson, JD, in the
Atlanta office of the Culhane Meadows law firm. The mere association with such charges could be
damaging even at this stage, he says, before they are proven true or false.

The ultimate impact on WSU and the company will depend on exactly what is in the license agreement, he says. Some licenses include representations and warranties by the researcher that the research results are genuine, and some include statements that indemnify the licensee against damages if there are violations of federal law, regulations, or breaches of any assurances made by the patent owner, he notes.

The contract also can include grounds for termination of the license agreement if the research fails to pass peer review or the results are called into question in a meaningful way, Anderson says. In that case all the rights would revert back to the university and it would be as if the license never
existed, he says.

In other situations in which fraud is alleged but the university is not directly vested in the company’s financial success, termination can be a way to remove the university’s name from the scandal and protect its reputation, he says.

“The license should guide the university in how to extract itself from this situation. But that requires forethought about what can happen and what you would want to do in response, and not every license addresses this well,” he says. “The first line of defense for the university should be to look at what the license agreement says about termination. It should be a best practice to have a thorough part of the agreement addressing termination, to protect the university and to let the faculty and students submitting research know that if they’re going to found a start-up company, the risk is on them if there
are allegations of fraud.”

However, Anderson acknowledges that researchers are likely to push back on including termination terms for mere allegations of fraud. Robert C. Klinger, JD, an attorney with the Dallas, TX, office of Culhane Meadows, who represents researchers and start-ups in licensing transactions, says he would urge his clients to resist such a clause in the licensing agreement.

“Allegations are easy to throw. If it’s proven fraud, that’s a different thing,” Klinger says. “If I’m only accused, you can’t start taking my patent rights. It’s valuable property. If I was representing the inventor and the agreement says the university gets all the patent rights when there are allegations of fraud, I wouldn’t let my client sign that.”

The complete article can be found here.


About Culhane MeadowsBig Law for the New Economy®
The largest woman-owned national full-service business law firm in the U.S., Culhane Meadows fields over 70 partners in eleven major markets across the country. Uniquely structured, the firm’s Disruptive Law® business model gives attorneys greater work-life flexibility while delivering outstanding, partner-level legal services to major corporations and emerging companies across industry sectors more efficiently and cost-effectively than conventional law firms. Clients enjoy exceptional and highly-efficient legal services provided exclusively by partner-level attorneys with significant experience and training from large law firms or in-house legal departments of respected corporations. U.S. News & World Report has named Culhane Meadows among the country’s “Best Law Firms” in its 2014 through 2020 rankings and many of the firm’s partners are regularly recognized in Chambers, Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers and Martindale-Hubbell Peer Reviews.


The foregoing content is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Federal, state, and local laws can change rapidly and, therefore, this content may become obsolete or outdated. Please consult with an attorney of your choice to ensure you obtain the most current and accurate counsel about your particular situation.

*Culhane Meadows is ranked by U.S. News/Best Law Firms in Technology Law, Bankruptcy/Reorganization Law, and Information Technology Law. This website and the communications herein may be considered attorney advertising. Previous results are not a guarantee of future outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information herein is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Until you establish such a relationship and receive an engagement letter, you have not hired a Culhane Meadows attorney nor become a client of the firm. Whether you are a new or existing client of the firm, Culhane Meadows must determine that there is no conflict of interest and that it is willing and otherwise able to accept the new engagement before representing you on a new matter. Only if and after Culhane Meadows has informed you it is willing and able to accept your new matter should you send the firm any information or documents that you consider private or confidential. Such information will not be treated as private, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure until Culhane Meadows has communicated in writing that it is willing and able to accept your new matter and provide you with legal counsel. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer or law firm you select are important decisions that should not be based on this website alone.